Knowlet

Unit 2: Bioethics - Abortion and Euthanasia

Examining the morality of life-ending decisions.

1. Sanctity of Life vs. Quality of Life

Two fundamental principles guide bioethical decisions:

  • Sanctity of Life (SoL): The view that human life is intrinsically sacred and has absolute value, regardless of its condition. It usually prohibits all forms of killing.
  • Quality of Life (QoL): The view that the value of life depends on certain conditions (consciousness, lack of pain, autonomy). If a life lacks these, it may be considered "not worth living."

2. The Moral Debate on Abortion

Abortion is the deliberate termination of a pregnancy. The debate usually centers on the conflict between the rights of the fetus and the rights of the mother.

Major Positions:

  • Pro-Life (Conservative): Argues that a fetus is a human being from conception and has a right to life. Abortion is seen as murder.
  • Pro-Choice (Liberal): Argues that a woman has the right to bodily autonomy and that a fetus is not a "person" with full moral rights until a certain stage (e.g., viability or birth).

3. The Concept of Personhood

A key question in Unit 2 is: When does a human being become a "Person"?

Philosophers like Mary Anne Warren suggest criteria for personhood:

  1. Consciousness
  2. Reasoning
  3. Self-motivated activity
  4. Capacity to communicate
  5. Presence of self-concepts

If a fetus does not meet these, some argue it does not have a "right to life" in the same way an adult does.

4. Euthanasia (Mercy Killing)

Euthanasia is the practice of intentionally ending a life to relieve pain and suffering. It is classified into several types:

Type Definition
Voluntary Requested by a competent patient.
Non-Voluntary Patient is unable to give consent (e.g., in a coma); family decides.
Active Deliberate action taken to end life (e.g., lethal injection).
Passive Withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment (e.g., turning off a ventilator).

Exam Essentials

  • The Slippery Slope Argument: A common exam topic. It suggests that if we legalize voluntary euthanasia, it will inevitably lead to non-voluntary killing and the devaluation of life.
  • Doctrine of Double Effect: Often applied to end-of-life care. It argues that if a doctor gives a high dose of morphine to relieve pain (good intent), even if it hastens death (unintended side effect), it is morally permissible.
  • Judith Jarvis Thomson’s "Violinist" Argument: A famous defense of abortion rights—be sure to know this analogy for 10-15 mark questions.

Did this help you understand better?

Your feedback improves the quality of this resource for everyone.