An interview is a primary method of data collection involving a direct, face-to-face (or telephonic) conversation between a researcher (interviewer) and a subject (respondent).
Meaning: A questionnaire is a data collection instrument that consists of a set of questions to be answered by the respondent. The key feature is that it is self-administered. The respondent reads the questions and fills in the answers themselves.
Examples: A Google Form, a paper survey sent by mail, a feedback form in a restaurant.
| Merits (Pros) | Demerits (Cons) |
|---|---|
| Low Cost: Can be distributed to thousands of people (via email, web) for very little money. | Low Response Rate: Many people who receive a questionnaire will not bother to fill it out. |
| No Interviewer Bias: The respondent's answers are not influenced by the presence of an interviewer. | No Clarification: If the respondent misunderstands a question, there is no one to explain it. This leads to invalid answers. |
| Anonymity: Respondents may feel more comfortable giving honest answers to sensitive questions (e.g., about income, personal habits) because it is anonymous. | Literacy is Required: Can only be used with populations who can read and write. |
| Convenience: The respondent can fill it out at their own pace and time. | Lack of Control: You don't know *who* actually filled it out (e.g., a boss might fill out the form for their employee). |
Meaning: A schedule is also a data collection instrument consisting of a set of questions. The key feature is that it is administered by an enumerator (the researcher/interviewer). The enumerator reads the questions and records the respondent's answers.
Examples: The Census of India, a face-to-face opinion poll.
| Merits (Pros) | Demerits (Cons) |
|---|---|
| High Response Rate: It's harder for people to refuse a face-to-face request. The enumerator ensures all questions are answered. | High Cost: Very expensive. You must hire, train, and pay many enumerators. |
| Works for All Populations: The respondent does not need to be literate, as the enumerator reads the questions. | Interviewer Bias: The enumerator's presence, tone, or wording can influence the answers given. |
| Clarification is Possible: If a respondent is confused, the enumerator can explain the question (in a neutral way). | Time-Consuming: Collecting data face-to-face is a very slow process. |
| Control over Data: The enumerator ensures the right person answers and that the context is appropriate. | Less Anonymity: People may be less willing to share sensitive information in a face-to-face setting. |
The *only* difference is who fills it out. The questions themselves might be identical.
Common Exam Questions:
How to Answer the "Distinguish" Question:
A perfect answer would be a table. The core point is: "The primary difference lies in who administers the tool. A questionnaire is self-administered by the respondent, while a schedule is administered by a trained enumerator."
Then, list the *consequences* of this difference: